<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content On The Cheap &#8211; Stealing From the Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bestseocopywriter.com/Wordpress/2009/02/02/content-on-the-cheap-stealing-from-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bestseocopywriter.com/Wordpress/2009/02/02/content-on-the-cheap-stealing-from-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Learning, teaching, sharing - Information on copywriting and SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 22:37:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Health-info-tips</title>
		<link>http://www.bestseocopywriter.com/Wordpress/2009/02/02/content-on-the-cheap-stealing-from-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Health-info-tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestseocopywriter.com/Wordpress/?p=79#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I understand the predicament of a writer.  After having  spent time researching, writing a good article  and at the end of the day, some &#039;smart&#039; dude plagiarised your hardwork and claim ownership of it.  That really sucks!

Part of the blame should be shifted to the so called &quot;Marketing Gurus&quot; that invented scripts which could rewrite &#039;stolen&#039; articles turning them into &#039;unique&#039; articles  selling these scripts like hot cakes to newbies!    So who started plagiarism in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the predicament of a writer.  After having  spent time researching, writing a good article  and at the end of the day, some &#8217;smart&#8217; dude plagiarised your hardwork and claim ownership of it.  That really sucks!</p>
<p>Part of the blame should be shifted to the so called &#8220;Marketing Gurus&#8221; that invented scripts which could rewrite &#8217;stolen&#8217; articles turning them into &#8216;unique&#8217; articles  selling these scripts like hot cakes to newbies!    So who started plagiarism in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://www.bestseocopywriter.com/Wordpress/2009/02/02/content-on-the-cheap-stealing-from-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestseocopywriter.com/Wordpress/?p=79#comment-187</guid>
		<description>While I agree that stealing content from others and reworking it is wrong, that&#039;s not what Dan was recommending (unless I missed something in that post). One of the examples he gave was using public domain works. While the end result may or may not be worth anything, that&#039;s a far cry from stealing someone else&#039;s work.  I&#039;m fairly certain he didn&#039;t mean to imply that anyone should do this: &quot;This means that Mr. Zarella is advocating using the content we’ve written, that our clients have paid for – our original, researched work – and copying it&quot;.  So, a discussion centered around &quot;value&quot; of legitimate content reuse is good, but let&#039;s not get upset about something that Dan didn&#039;t suggest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that stealing content from others and reworking it is wrong, that&#8217;s not what Dan was recommending (unless I missed something in that post). One of the examples he gave was using public domain works. While the end result may or may not be worth anything, that&#8217;s a far cry from stealing someone else&#8217;s work.  I&#8217;m fairly certain he didn&#8217;t mean to imply that anyone should do this: &#8220;This means that Mr. Zarella is advocating using the content we’ve written, that our clients have paid for – our original, researched work – and copying it&#8221;.  So, a discussion centered around &#8220;value&#8221; of legitimate content reuse is good, but let&#8217;s not get upset about something that Dan didn&#8217;t suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Orsini</title>
		<link>http://www.bestseocopywriter.com/Wordpress/2009/02/02/content-on-the-cheap-stealing-from-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Orsini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bestseocopywriter.com/Wordpress/?p=79#comment-66</guid>
		<description>You make an excellent distinction between research (i.e., citing your sources) and stealing (i.e., lifting and rewriting). Thanks for this important post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make an excellent distinction between research (i.e., citing your sources) and stealing (i.e., lifting and rewriting). Thanks for this important post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
